Ordonez v. Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Norma Ordonez
Defendant: Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. doing business as Evolution Dominican Hair Style and Roma Reyes
Case Number: 1:2020cv05127
Filed: October 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, a Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 1/20/2021 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon. The Parties must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 1/14/2021. Plaintiff'scounsel is expected to provide Defendants' counsel with a detailed calculation of damages at least one week prior to the Initial Conference. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Please do not use the speaker function on your phone, remember to identify yourselves every time you speak, and speak slowly and deliberately for purposes of the record. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/14/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
December 11, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp., Roma Reyes. (Jung, Hong)
December 11, 2020 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. (Jung, Hong)
December 11, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Hong Keun Jung on behalf of Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp., Roma Reyes (aty to be noticed) (Jung, Hong)
November 23, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norma Ordonez. Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. served on 11/20/2020, answer due 12/11/2020. (Faillace, Michael)
November 19, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Clifford Tucker on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Tucker, Clifford)
October 26, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp., Roma Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly)
October 26, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 26, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 26, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp., Roma Reyes filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13582147 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Norma Ordonez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Faillace, Michael)
October 26, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ordonez v. Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evolution Dominican Hair Style Salon Corp. doing business as Evolution Dominican Hair Style
Represented By: Hong Keun Jung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roma Reyes
Represented By: Hong Keun Jung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norma Ordonez
Represented By: Michael A. Faillace
Represented By: Clifford Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?