Bryant v. City of New York et al
| Raymond Bryant |
| Alexandra Munoz and City of New York |
| 1:2020cv05452 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City of New York, Alexandra Munoz. (Weiner, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order (jointly submitted) in advance of the Initial Conference, by Raymond Bryant (Lumer, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Letter (jointly submitted) in advance of the Initial Conference, by Raymond Bryant (Lumer, Michael) |
ORDER granting in part #10 . Defendant Munoz's time to answer is stayed pending the Initial Status Conference on 1/12/2021. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/27/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Alexandra Munoz. (Weiner, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond Bryant. Alexandra Munoz served on 12/3/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (Lumer, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by City of New York. (Weiner, Joshua) |
|
ORDER denying as unnecessary #8 . The ACC did not read this Court's Order carefully. The Order said that the Court "will set an answer date at the conference if it has been inconvenient for the City to answer prior to the conference." The conference has been reset to 1/12/2021. That means the City does not have to answer before 1/12/2021 unless it wants to, and if it doesn't, the Court will set a new date at the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/2/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
ORDER granting in part #7 . The Court has previously advised many ACCs to stop sending the City's form letter that requests an adjournment of the Initial Status Conference until issue is joined and for a sua sponte extension to answer for the individual defendant. The Court does not grant the first request because the boilerplate answer is of little to no use in planning discovery so there is no reason to wait. It does not grant the second request because the individual defendant is obligated to answer in accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, and since the City isn't going to act as his counsel, the Court isn't either. Notwithstanding the above, the Initial Status Conference is adjourned to 1/12/2021 at 12:30 p.m. That will have given the City two months since it was served, plenty of time to talk to the police officer involved, submit the Joint Summary Letter and Case Management Plan required by this Court's scheduling order, and fully participate in the conference. The Court will set an answer date at the conference if it has been inconvenient for the City to answer prior to the conference. The conference will be held by telephone. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 5452#. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/2/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by City of New York. (Weiner, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond Bryant. City of New York served on 11/11/2020, answer due 12/2/2020. (Lumer, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 12/23/2020 at 11:00 in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/10/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of New York, Alexandra Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13662368 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Raymond Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons - NYC, #3 Proposed Summons Summons - Munoz) (Lumer, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
