Caprice Electronics, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Group
| Caprice Electronics, Inc. |
| The Hanover Insurance Group doing business as The Hanover Insurance Company |
| 1:2020cv05670 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to File #12 is granted. The parties shall select an arbitrator by 1/22/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/8/2021. (Farrell, Gillian)
|
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Stipulation for Selection of Mediator by The Hanover Insurance Group. (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial/telephone conference will be held at 11:30 AM on 4/16/2021 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 11:30 AM conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 4/16/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/29/2020. (Manson, Eddie)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Caprice Electronics, Inc.. (Isaacson, Jason) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by The Hanover Insurance Group. (Attachments: #1 Certification of J. O'Leary in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit 1 to Certification of J. O'Leary, #3 Certificate of Service) (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 8 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration and NOTICE Scheduling Arbitration Hearing. Procedures and Instructions for the selection of arbitrator sent to counsel. The Arbitration hearing is scheduled for March 30, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. The deadline to select the Arbitrator is January 7, 2021 . Counsel will select the Arbitrator from the Courts Panel of Arbitrators found at: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/adr/Arbitration/displayAllArb.cfm?geo=&specialtyMult=21 In preparation for the arbitration hearing counsel will review the EDNY REMOTE GUIDELINES FOR ARBITRATION PARTICIPANTS included with this notice. Counsel will submit the fully executed Stipulation for Selection of Arbitrator by email to the Arbitration Coordinator: Rita Credle at: rita_credle@nyed.uscourts.gov. , Rita). Modified on 12/9/2020 (Credle, Rita). |
|
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #7 is granted. Any response to the Motion to Remand #5 shall be filed by 12/11/2020 and any reply shall be filed by 12/22/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/9/2020. (Farrell, Gillian)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by The Hanover Insurance Group. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation Adjourning Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Hanover Insurance Group. (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Caprice Electronics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affirmation in Support, #2 Memorandum of Law in Support, #3 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal) (Isaacson, Jason) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Hanover Insurance Group identifying Corporate Parent The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Other Affiliate Opus Investment Management, Inc. for The Hanover Insurance Group. (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Hanover Insurance Group from Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, case number 520354/2020. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-13718067) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal - Kings County Complaint) (O'Leary, Jeremiah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
