Sanfo v. Societe Air France
Plaintiff: BASSIROU SANFO
Defendant: Societe Air France
Case Number: 1:2020cv05819
Filed: December 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Roanne L Mann
Nature of Suit: Airplane
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher B. Kende on behalf of Societe Air France (notification declined or already on case) (Kende, Christopher)
December 18, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher B. Kende on behalf of Societe Air France (aty to be noticed) (Kende, Christopher)
December 17, 2020 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bassirou Sanfo. Societe Air France waiver sent on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. (Zeitzoff, David)
December 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Arthur Zeitzoff on behalf of Bassirou Sanfo (aty to be noticed) (Zeitzoff, David)
December 2, 2020 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 2, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Societe Air France. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 1, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Societe Air France filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-13766638, filed by BASSIROU SANFO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bohrer, Abram)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanfo v. Societe Air France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Societe Air France
Represented By: Christopher Burgess Kende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BASSIROU SANFO
Represented By: Abram I. Bohrer
Represented By: David Arthur Zeitzoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?