Nunez v. Saul
| Mayra Josefina Nunez |
| Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv05907 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Social Security: HIA |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank D. Tankard on behalf of Andrew Saul (aty to be noticed) (Tankard, Frank) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service Summons & Complaint served on SSA, US Attorney & Attorney General of the US on 12/15/2020, filed by Mayra Josefina Nunez. (Simon, Barry) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 12/14/2020 Electronic Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , #1 Complaint by Mayra Josefina Nunez (Simon, Barry) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Granting plaintiff's motion #2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 12/14/2020. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| SECOND NOTICE: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mayra Josefina Nunez. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Mayra Josefina Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
