Llovet v. Tessler et al
| JANA LLOVET |
| ESTHER ALTER, AARON TESSLER, MENDEL TESSLER and Mendal Tessler |
| 1:2020cv05988 |
| December 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference filed by Jana Llovet. (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jana Llovet. (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 13 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Esther Alter, Aaron Tessler, Mendal Tessler. (Koster, Kelly) |
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/7/2021. (Reyes, Ramon)
|
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move by Esther Alter, Aaron Tessler, Mendal Tessler. (Koster, Kelly) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Robreno Koster on behalf of Esther Alter, Aaron Tessler, Mendal Tessler (aty to be noticed) (Koster, Kelly) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jana Llovet. Aaron Tessler served on 12/29/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jana Llovet. Esther Alter served on 12/18/2020, answer due 1/8/2021. (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jana Llovet. Mendal Tessler served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Esther Alter, Aaron Tessler, Mendal Tessler. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by JANA LLOVET (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by JANA LLOVET (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by JANA LLOVET (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ESTHER ALTER, AARON TESSLER, MENDEL TESSLER filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-13804533 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by JANA LLOVET. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Marzec, Darius) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
