Kelman v. First Premier Bank et al
| Aida Kelman |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, First Premier Bank, TransUnion, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv06127 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Weinstein, Brett) |
| Filing 17 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion, LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by First Premier Bank. (Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by First Premier Bank identifying Corporate Parent United National Corporation for First Premier Bank. (Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 14 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #13 Amended Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Stieber, Courtney) |
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is extended to March 8, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/27/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Aida Kelman. (Benedict, Steven) |
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Stipulated Extension Request by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Stieber, Courtney) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Equifax Information Services, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent to Removal (Stieber, Courtney) |
|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to March 8, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/13/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and terminating #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant First Premier Bank to answer or otherwise respond is extended to January 25, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/4/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond is extended to February 4, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/4/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond by First Premier Bank. (Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 9 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion, LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by First Premier Bank. (Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until and including February 4, 2021 by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Weinstein, Brett) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Weinstein, Brett) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Michael Weinstein on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Weinstein, Brett) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TransUnion, LLC identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion, LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TransUnion, LLC from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 524203/2020. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-13853413) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
