Mohammad v. Sri Hartimaa Inc. et al
Ullah Mohammad |
Sher Bhdur Karki and Sri Hartimaa Inc. |
1:2021cv00179 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Peggy Kuo |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sanjay Chaubey on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Chaubey, Sanjay) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ullah Mohammad. Sher Bhdur Karki served on 2/10/2021, answer due 3/3/2021. (Gershbaum, Charles) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ullah Mohammad. Sri Hartimaa Inc. served on 2/4/2021, answer due 2/25/2021. (Gershbaum, Charles) |
Filing 5 ORDER IN FLSA CASE REQUIRING DISCOVERY AND SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION SCHEDULE: The parties are ordered to engage in discovery as outlined in the attached Order, and to engage in early settlement discussions. A joint status report regarding settlement efforts must be filed by July 14, 2021. If the parties are unable to settle on their own, the case will be referred to EDNY Court-Annexed Mediation for formal mediation. The parties may move to waive these requirements and permit the parties to proceed by way of a Proposed Discovery Plan only for good cause, by filing a joint letter request on ECF. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/14/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Ullah Mohammad (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet completed Civ. Cover Sheet) (Gershbaum, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-13983693 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by ULLAH MOHAMMAD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gershbaum, Charles) |
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.