Mack et al v. Delta Air Line, Inc. et al
| Lance Mack |
| Argenbright Holdings Limited, Delta Air Line, Inc., Barry Colburn, Unifi, John O'Dwyer, Agile-One, Allsource, Delta Air Line Global Services, Delta Global Services, ERMC Aviation Services, Allsource PPS, Inc. and UNIFI ALLSOURCE PPS, INC. |
| 1:2021cv00519 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lance Mack. Argenbright Holdings Limited served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Liliya Perelman Kramer on behalf of Agile-One, Delta Air Line Global Services, John O'Dwyer (aty to be noticed) (Kramer, Liliya) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Ira Gregg Rosenstein on behalf of Agile-One, Delta Air Line Global Services, John O'Dwyer (aty to be noticed) (Rosenstein, Ira) |
| Filing 27 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lance Mack. Agile-One served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 26 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lance Mack. John O'Dwyer served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (Hagan, Special) |
| Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held on 3/24/2021 before Judge Brian M. Cogan. Counsel for plaintiff appeared, as did counsel for defendants Delta Airlines, Inc.; Delta Air Line Global Services; Allsource PPS, Inc.; and Barry Colburn. No appearance for defendants Agile-One, Argenbright Holdings Limited, Unifi, and John O'Dwyer. The Court set the following schedule: by 4/23/2021, defendants shall file a letter motion for a premotion conference setting forth the basis for their proposed motion to dismiss; by 4/30/2021, plaintiff shall file a response indicating whether he intends to file a Second Amended Complaint and, if so, attaching the proposed complaint. The Court also denied plaintiff's motion to certify the FLSA collective action #23 without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's individual practices. The Court stayed discovery pending resolution of defendants' letter motion. See transcript for details. (Court Reporter: Michele Nardone.) (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Liliya Perelman Kramer on behalf of Allsource PPS, Inc., Barry Colburn, Delta Air Line, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Kramer, Liliya) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Ira Gregg Rosenstein on behalf of Allsource PPS, Inc., Barry Colburn, Delta Air Line, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Rosenstein, Ira) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Certify FLSA Collective Action Request to Apply for conditional collective action certification and Plaintiff's Proposed Case Management Plan by Lance Mack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Hagan, Special) |
| Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held on 03/17/2021 before Judge Brian M. Cogan. Both sides present by telephone. A telephonic Status Conference is set for 03/24/2021 at 11:00 A.M. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 0519#. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 22 Summons Issued as to Allsource PPS, Inc.. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 21 Summons Issued as to Allsource, Argenbright Holdings Limited, Barry Colburn, Delta Air Line Global Services, Delta Air Line, Inc., John O'Dwyer. (Attachments: #1 summons issued, #2 summons issued, #3 summons issued, #4 summons issued, #5 summons issued) (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 20 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 19 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 18 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 14 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT Corrected against Lance Mack, filed by Lance Mack. (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lance Mack, filed by Lance Mack. (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 6 Letter Requesting Leave of Court until February 5th to Revise Plaintiff's Complaint by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 3/17/2021 at 11:00 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 0519#. The parties are directed to comply with the attached mandatory requirements, including filing on the docket a completed case management plan prior to the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/2/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
ORDER denying #6 as unnecessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). In addition, counsel is advised that this letter should have been designated as an ECF event Letter "Motion" since it seeks relief from the Court. Do not refile. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/2/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, by Lance Mack (Hagan, Special) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lance Mack filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14077217 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Lance Mack. (Hagan, Special) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please submit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
