Double Green Produce, Inc. v. New York Mart Mott St., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Double Green Produce, Inc.
Defendant: New York Mart Group Inc. and New York Mart Mott St., Inc.
Debtor: Long Deng
Case Number: 1:2021cv00615
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Rachel P Kovner
Referring Judge: Roanne L Mann
Nature of Suit: Agriculture Acts
Cause of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Order Dismissing Case: The Notice of Voluntary Dismissal at #10 is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 3/31/2021. (Almonte, Giselle)
March 30, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Double Green Produce, Inc. (Tsai, Victor)
March 20, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Double Green Produce, Inc.. New York Mart Group Inc. served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021. (Tsai, Victor)
March 20, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Double Green Produce, Inc.. New York Mart Mott St., Inc. served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021. (Tsai, Victor)
March 20, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Double Green Produce, Inc.. Long Deng served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021. (Tsai, Victor)
February 9, 2021 Filing 6 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d). The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) (3). An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. The hearing will occur approximately 120 days after filing of the Answer. (Credle, Rita)
February 8, 2021 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 8, 2021 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 8, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Mott Group summons, #2 Deng summons) (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 7, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Double Green Produce, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Tsai, Victor)
February 4, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Deng, New York Mart Group Inc., New York Mart Mott St., Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14101461 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Double Green Produce, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tsai, Victor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Double Green Produce, Inc. v. New York Mart Mott St., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Mart Group Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Mart Mott St., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Double Green Produce, Inc.
Represented By: Victor Wen-Li Tsai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Long Deng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?