K.R. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| M.R., K.R. and Z.R. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2021cv00657 |
| February 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Robert M Levy |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by New York City Department of Education. (Kruk, Carolyn) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER:An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for May 17, 2021 at 11:00 a.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. All counsel must be available. Plaintiffs counsel is directed to confirm with defendants counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Initial Conference set for 5/17/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/31/2021. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (Marino, Janine)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to 4/1/21. All Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/6/2021. (Levy, Robert)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by New York City Department of Education. (Kruk, Carolyn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Elizabeth Kruk on behalf of New York City Department of Education (aty to be noticed) (Kruk, Carolyn) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by K.R., M.R., Z.R.. New York City Department of Education served on 2/9/2021, answer due 3/2/2021. (Walsh, Tracey) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to New York City Department of Education. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14109199 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by M.R.(on behalf of Z.R.), K.R.(individually), M.R.(individually), K.R.(on behalf of Z.R.), Z.R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Walsh, Tracey) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/8/2021) (Lee, Tiffeny). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
