Cell Deal Inc. v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
| Cell Deal Inc. |
| Fedex Freight, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00788 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Diane Gujarati |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order by Fedex Freight, Inc. (Wright, George) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, a Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 4/15/2021 at 12:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon. The Parties must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 4/8/2021. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Please do not use the speaker function on your phone, remember to identify yourselves every time you speak, and speak slowly and deliberately for purposes of the record. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/23/2021. (Quinlan, Krista) (Quinlan, Krista).
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (First Amended Complaint) by Fedex Freight, Inc.. (Wright, George) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cell Deal Inc. certificate of service First Amended Complaint (Bronstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cell Deal Inc., filed by Cell Deal Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Bronstein, Joshua) |
|
ORDER -- Plaintiff's #7 Motion for Extension of Time is granted on consent. Plaintiff's deadline is extended to March 12, 2021. In light of Plaintiff's forthcoming amendment, the Court terminates Defendant's #5 Motion for Leave to File Document. Defendant may re-file its Motion should Plaintiff ultimately decline to amend its Complaint. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 3/5/2021. (Almonte, Kelly)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint by Cell Deal Inc.. (Bronstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 Letter to Hon. Diane Gujarati, U.S.D.J. by Fedex Freight, Inc. (Wright, George) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Document by Fedex Freight, Inc.. (Wright, George) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 4653155078 (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| The case of Cell Deal Inc. v. FedEx Freight, Inc., has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. The case number is 21cv788. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Notice of Removal) against Cell Deal Inc. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Fedex Freight, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Summons & Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wright, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cell Deal Inc. v. FedEx Freight, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cell Deal Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Reid Bronstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fedex Freight, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | George W. Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
