Rountree v. Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
| Pamela Rountree |
| Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC and Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC |
| 1:2021cv01046 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC (Williamson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC (Williamson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Exhibits, Affirmative Factual and Legal Defenses and Certificate of Service by Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Williamson, Mitchell) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: An telephonic-initial conference will be held at 10:30 A.M. on 6/18/2021 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 10:30 A.M. conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 6/18/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 4/13/2021. (Manson, Eddie)
|
| Filing 10 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d). The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) (3). An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. (Credle, Rita) |
|
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #9 is granted. Defendants shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 by 4/23/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/20/2021. (Farrell, Gillian)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC. (Williamson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mitchell Lee Williamson on behalf of Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Williamson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pamela Rountree. Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pamela Rountree. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC served on 3/2/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Mark Cader on behalf of Pamela Rountree (aty to be noticed) (Cader, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14211079 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Pamela Rountree. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
