Kandov v. Taylor et al
Plaintiff: VIOLETA KANDOV
Defendant: HON. JANICE A. TAYLOR, HON. BETSY BARROS, HON. JEFFREY A. COHEN, HON. MARK C. DILLON and HON. FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
Case Number: 1:2021cv01346
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint by May 28, 2021 and to adjourn the April 27, 2021 Initial Scheduling Conference until after May 28, 2021 by Betsy Barros, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Francesca E. Connolly, Mark C. Dillon, Janice A. Taylor. (Wang, Shi-Shi)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting in part #10 . The amount of time requested is not clear. The State Defendants' motion suggests that they want 45 days "to determine representation of the State Defendants and thereafter " on some unspecified future date, "for counsel to proceed " with an answer or motion. The Court therefore grants defendants until 5/28/2021 to answer or move. The telephonic Initial Status Conference is adjourned to 5/25/2021 at 10:00 am because defendants' answer is unlikely to be useful in planning discovery, and if defendants intend to move, they should have a premotion conference letter submitted well prior to that time. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 1346#. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/31/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Violeta Kandov. Betsy Barros served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Jeffrey A. Cohen served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Francesca E. Connolly served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Mark C. Dillon served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Janice A. Taylor served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021. (Dayan, Albert)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 EXHIBIT "C" refiled to replace the EXHIBIT "C", by Violeta Kandov. Related document: #3 Amended Complaint filed by Violeta Kandov. (Dayan, Albert)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 4/27/2021 at 11:00 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 1346#. The parties are directed to comply with the attached mandatory requirements, including filing on the docket a completed case management plan prior to the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/17/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Violeta Kandov (Dayan, Albert)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. Incorrect Proposed Summons document submitted. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Violeta Kandov. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dayan, Albert)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please submit completed 2 Page Form Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE re #2 Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening : Due to the amount of errors made when filing this case, Plaintiff counsel is advised to refer to the Attorney Case Opening Video Tutorial/Manual before filing another case electronically. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14274932, filed by VIOLETA KANDOV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (Dayan, Albert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kandov v. Taylor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VIOLETA KANDOV
Represented By: Albert Y. Dayan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. JANICE A. TAYLOR
Represented By: Shi-Shi Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. BETSY BARROS
Represented By: Shi-Shi Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. JEFFREY A. COHEN
Represented By: Shi-Shi Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. MARK C. DILLON
Represented By: Shi-Shi Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
Represented By: Shi-Shi Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?