Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. v. Visa Inc. et al
| Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. |
| Mastercard Incorporated, Visa Inc., Visa USA, Inc., VISA International Service Association, Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated |
| James Orenstein |
| 1:2021cv01519 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER APPOINTING Special Master re 8831 Letter from Rule 23(b)(3) Class Counsel re Proposed Order Appointing Special Master; 8833 Certain Absent Class Members' Letter Seeking Modification of Proposed Order; 8836 Old Jericho's Letter Objecting to Proposed Order; 8837 Fikes Wholesale's Letter Regarding Special Master Procedures; 8838 Jack Rabbit's Letter in Response to Minute Orders. The Court finds that appointment of a Special Master is warranted and appoints the Honorable James Orenstein (Ret.) as Special Master to resolve any disputes or matters arising out of or relating to the Plan of Administration, including the proper scope of a requested exclusion from the Rule23(b)(3) Settlement Class and the resolution of claims made to the Net Cash Settlement Fund as well as any other matters the Court refers to the Special Master. As set forth in the attached order, the Court adopts the modification to Class Counsel's Proposed Order regarding confidentiality requested by Certain Class Members but otherwise adopts the procedures set forth in Class Counsels Proposed Order, except as to the manner of review by the Court of the Special Master's reports and recommendations. The Court denies Certain Class Members request that the Court shorten the time frames for filings; Old Jericho and Jack Rabbit's objection that the disputes regarding franchisees and franchisors should be resolved in the first instance by the special master; and Jack Rabbit's objections that the order should clarify that the parties are required to put any approval of ex parte contact in writing and that any financial information must be filed under seal. The Court reserves decision as to whether to certify a subclass and appoint subclass counsel. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/2/2023. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TLH)
|
| Filing 26 Letter in Response to ECF 8869 and ECF 8867 by Jack Rabbit LLC Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Rothstein, Paul) |
|
ORDER re 8831 Letter from Rule 23(b)(3) Class Counsel in response to the Court's minute entry. The Court directs parties and objectors to submit any objection to the proposed special masters or special master procedures on or before May 26, 2023. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/19/2023. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (AB)
|
| Filing 25 Minute entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. On May 11, 2023 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6F North, the Court heard from the parties and objectors. Damages action:The parties will first try to resolve service awards issue in view of the Second Circuit decision, but if they are unable to do so, Class Counsel will advise the Court and file a motion and the Court will give objectors an opportunity to respond. On or before May 18, 2023, the parties shall submit the names of at least two additional potential candidates for special master as well as a proposed order regarding the role of the special master; the Court will give other parties the opportunity to respond to the proposal. The Court will consider requests from counsel to be appointed to represent the franchisees as a class; and Class Counsel will have the opportunity to explain why current counsel can fairly present the issues to the special master and why the Court should delay any appointment of counsel to represent the franchisees. Jack Rabbit will serve a second renewed motion to intervene on or before May 18, 2023; Class Counsel and Old Jericho Plaintiffs (and any other party) will serve a response on or before June 1, 2023; Jack Rabbit will serve and file any reply on or before June 8, 2023. Equitable Relief Action, opt-out actions and actions filed after the (b)(3) settlement:On or before June 11, 2023, the parties will advise the Court as to whether they would like to supplement their response to Defendants' summary judgment motion to address the issue of direct evidence of an anticompetitive effect in the two-sided transaction market. See 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 1 F.4th 102 (2d Cir. 2021); see also Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993) ("Expert testimony is useful as a guide to interpreting market facts, but it is not a substitute for them."); Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. V. British Airways PLC, 257 F.3d 256, 264 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that expert testimony rooted in hypothetical assumptions cannot substitute for "actual market data"). On or before June 12, 2023, counsel will submit a joint letter with their proposed schedule for supplemental discovery to conclude no later than November 9, 2023. If counsel believe that they need longer than the previously requested 150 days to complete discovery, they should explain their reasons for the additional time requested. To the extent counsel do not agree on the proposed schedule for supplemental discovery, they should explain with specificity the reasons their disagreement(s). Grubhub Plaintiffs will join Target's summary judgment motion and supplemental letters and Defendants will file any summary judgment motions within sixty days of Grubhubs filings; the parties will agree a briefing schedule. On or before June 11, 2023, the parties in Lanning and Camp Coffee Grounds will propose a schedule for discovery. (Court Reporter Sophie Nolan.) Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (AB) |
|
ORDER granting 8821 request to listen to status conference remotely. All parties are informed that the court's public line and access code will be published on the Court's calendar. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/5/2023. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (AB)
|
|
ORDER granting (207) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-03800-MKB-VMS; granting (213) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-03924-MKB-VMS; granting (208) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-03925-MKB-VMS; granting (202) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04131-MKB-VMS; granting (230) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04194-MKB-VMS; granting (272) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04521-MKB-VMS; granting (273) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04520-MKB-VMS; granting (253) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04650-MKB-VMS; granting (189) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04677-MKB-VMS; granting (244) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04728-MKB-VMS; granting (254) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04799-MKB-VMS; granting (8802) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS; granting (196) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-04974-MKB-VMS; granting (218) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05077-MKB-VMS; granting (237) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05075-MKB-VMS; granting (243) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05073-MKB-VMS; granting (223) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05071-MKB-VMS; granting (220) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05069-MKB-VMS; granting (219) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05081-MKB-VMS; granting (222) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05083-MKB-VMS; granting (219) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05082-MKB-VMS; granting (223) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05080-MKB-VMS; granting (214) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05078-MKB-VMS; granting (222) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05076-MKB-VMS; granting (219) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05074-MKB-VMS; granting (221) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05070-MKB-VMS; granting (217) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05072-MKB-VMS; granting (198) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05153-MKB-VMS; granting (265) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05207-MKB-VMS; granting (259) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05319-MKB-VMS; granting (202) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05352-MKB-VMS; granting (216) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05866-MKB-VMS; granting (154) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05885-MKB-VMS; granting (155) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05883-MKB-VMS; granting (154) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05881-MKB-VMS; granting (144) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05869-MKB-VMS; granting (150) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05871-MKB-VMS; granting (149) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05879-MKB-VMS; granting (150) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05880-MKB-VMS; granting (152) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05870-MKB-VMS; granting (156) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05868-MKB-VMS; granting (154) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05884-MKB-VMS; granting (154) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05882-MKB-VMS; granting (147) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:05-cv-05878-MKB-VMS; granting (153) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-00039-MKB-VMS; granting (107) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-00078-MKB-VMS; granting (107) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-01829-MKB-VMS; granting (107) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-01830-MKB-VMS; granting (107) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-01831-MKB-VMS; granting (107) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-01832-MKB-VMS; granting (113) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-02532-MKB-VMS; granting (114) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-02534-MKB-VMS; granting (96) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-05583-MKB-VMS; granting (108) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:06-cv-05765-MKB-VMS; granting (106) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:07-cv-00592-MKB-VMS; granting (87) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:09-cv-02264-MKB-VMS; granting (87) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:09-cv-03225-MKB-VMS; granting (83) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:13-cv-05352-MKB-VMS; granting (184) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:13-cv-05745-MKB-VMS; granting (263) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:13-cv-05746-MKB-VMS; granting (78) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:14-cv-00261-MKB-VMS; granting (90) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:14-cv-06450-MKB-VMS; granting (53) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:14-cv-07018-MKB-JO; granting (92) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:16-cv-05507-MKB-VMS; granting (41) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:17-cv-03531-MKB-JO; granting (82) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:17-cv-04362-MKB-VMS; granting (143) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:17-cv-04555-MKB-JO; granting (44) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:17-cv-05988-MKB-JO; granting (59) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:18-cv-04568-MKB-JO; granting (40) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-04256-MKB-JO; granting (93) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-04616-MKB-VMS; granting (39) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-05567-MKB-JO; granting (30) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 2:19-cv-05882-MKB-VMS; granting (66) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-06318-MKB-VMS; granting (71) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-06555-MKB-VMS; granting (23) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:20-cv-01325-MKB-JO; granting (20) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:20-cv-01483-MKB-JO; granting (47) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 2:20-cv-01517-MKB-VMS; granting (20) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:20-cv-02166-MKB-JO; granting (56) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 2:20-cv-02394-MKB-VMS; granting (21) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:20-cv-02495-MKB-JO; granting (20) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:20-cv-03791-MKB-JO; granting (46) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:21-cv-01175-MKB-VMS; granting (24) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:21-cv-01519-MKB-VMS; granting (42) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:21-cv-02360-MKB-VMS; granting (36) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:21-cv-03401-MKB-VMS; granting (21) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:21-cv-06708-MKB-VMS; granting (30) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:22-cv-04489-MKB-VMS; granting (7) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:23-cv-00232-MKB-VMS; granting (34) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:23-cv-01215-MKB-VMS. Attorney Arun Srinivas Subramanian terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 4/11/2023. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (GS)
|
| Filing 24 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Arun Subramanian by Gielen Enterprises,Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart Inc., Rice Palace,Inc.;, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Tobacco Plus,Inc.;. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel) Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Subramanian, Arun) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: In view of the Second Circuit's decision affirming the class settlement of the damages class action, Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon will hold a joint status conference on May 11, 2023 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6F. The parties are directed to submit a joint status report on or before April 21, 2023, regarding proposed next steps. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/23/2023. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (AB)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Change of Firm Name and E-Mail Addresses Once the filing has been made, you must login to www.pacer.gov and update your account. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Warshaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 22 Letter Pursuant to Chief Judge Brodies Individual Practices and Rules, subpart 3, governing motions. by Jack Rabbit LLC Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Bacharach, N.) |
| Filing 21 Letter Pursuant to Chief Judge Brodies Individual Practices and Rules, subpart 3, governing motions. by Jack Rabbit LLC Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Bacharach, N.) |
|
Filing 20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Redaction of Document 8720) re 8138. Motions to Exclude. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies 8138 Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert Opinions on EMV Chargebacks and for Partial Summary Judgment.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/9/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TL)
|
|
Filing 19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Redaction of Document 8719) re 8090, 8108, 8114, 8135, and 8207 Motions to Exclude. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies 8090 Motion to Exclude Portions of Report and Opinions of Defense Expert R. Garrison Harvey, grants in part and denies in part 8108 Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Defense Expert Glenn Hubbard, denies 8114 Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Defense Expert Barbara E. Kahn, denies 8135 Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Defense Expert David J. Teece, and grants in part and denies in part 8207 Motion to Exclude Portions of Report and Opinions of Defense Expert David P. Kaplan.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/9/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TL)
|
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Redaction of Document 8718) re 8077, 8086, 8080, and 8075 Motions to Exclude. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part 8077 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Mansour Karimzadeh, 8086 Motion to Exclude Report and Testimony of Dennis W. Carlton, 8080 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Stephen C. Mott, and 8075 Motion to Exclude Opinions of David P. Stowell.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/8/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TL)
|
|
Filing 17
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION (Redaction of Document 8717) re 8181 and 8200 Motions to Exclude and 8179 Motion for Joinder. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies 8181 Motion to Exclude Portions of Report & Opinions of Defense Expert Kevin M. Murphy, grants in part and denies in part 8200 Motion to Exclude Portions of Reports & Opinions of Defense Experts Marc Cleven & Stuart J. Fiske, and grants 8179 Motion for Joinder.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/8/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TL)
|
|
Filing 16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Redaction of Document 8716) re 8084 and 8070 Motions to Exclude. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies 8084 Motion to Exclude in Part Section 2 and Debit Opinions of Professor Jerry Hausman and 8070 Motion to Exclude Testimony Concerning Visa's Fixed Acquirer Network Fee.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/8/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (TL)
|
|
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to unseal Memorandum and Order 8715. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/26/2022. (AB)
|
|
ORDER granting 8723 Letter re Proposed Intervenors' request to withdraw their Renewed Motion to Intervene and Memorandum in Support Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24, request to file an amended version of the motion and proposed briefing schedule. The Proposed Intervenors shall serve their amended motion on or before November 3, 2022; parties shall serve any opposition on or before November 18, 2022; Proposed Intervenors shall serve their reply, if any, and file the motion on or before December 2, 2022. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/24/2022. (AB)
|
|
ORDER re 8709 Letter re Proposed Intervenors, Jack Rabbit, LLC, and 280 Station LLC (D/B/A/ Cowboys), Renewed Motion for Leave to Intervene and Memorandum in Support Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. The Court directs the proposed intervenors and parties to confer and file a proposed briefing schedule for the motion to intervene on or before October 24, 2022. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/14/2022. (AB) Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/14/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (AB)
|
|
The Court has filed Memoranda and Orders 8714 , 8715 , 8716 , 8717 , 8718 , 8719 , and 8720 under seal and directs the parties to identify on or before October 24, 2022, which portions, if any, should be redacted prior to a public filing. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/9/2022. (NC)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 1821 and 1829 Motions to Exclude. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies 1821 Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Defense Expert Andres V. Lerner and 1829 Motion to Exclude Portions of Report and Opinions of Defense Expert Kevin M. Murphy.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/8/2022. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (BBM)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (Valentin, Winnethka) |
|
ORDER in case 1:05-cv-03800-MKB-VMS; granting (8432) Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. in case 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS; granting (71) Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee.; granting (72) Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. in case 1:16-cv-05507-MKB-VMS Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 4/26/2021. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
|
ORDER re 8424 Letter filed by Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Class Plaintiffs' request for approval of 1st quarter 2021 tax payments for the Class I Cash Settlement Fund and Class II Interchange Settlement Fund is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 4/12/2021. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS et al. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
|
Filing 8
PLAINTIFF'S STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/2/2021. (Valentin, Winnethka)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal and Order by Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. Associated Cases: 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS, 1:21-cv-01519-MKB-VMS (Clarick, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole L. Gueron on behalf of Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. (aty to be noticed) (Gueron, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/23/2021) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. (Clarick, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Contrarian Funds, L.L.C. (Clarick, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14302706 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Contrarian Funds, L.L.C.. (Clarick, Gregory) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
