Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Segal
| WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A. and Wilimington Trust, N.A. |
| HERMAN SEGAL |
| 1:2021cv01540 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION re Status Report Order,, and sufficiency of service on defendant Herman Segal, by Wilimington Trust, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit) (Skeele, Katherine) |
ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, a plaintiff is to serve the defendant within 90 days from the filing of the complaint. The Court notes that summons was issued by the Clerk of the Court #4 on 3/24/2021, which summons included an address for defendant Herman Segal on Quentin Rd. in Brooklyn, New York. An Affidavit of Service filed 5/26/2021 #5 indicates that service was effected by affixing the summons to a door, and by mailing it to an address on East 17th Street in Brooklyn, New York. Plaintiff is directed to file an affidavit establishing proof of service by 7/23/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 7/1/2021. (Cahn, Gabriel)
|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Mahoney, Brenna) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilimington Trust, N.A.. Herman Segal served on 5/24/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. (Skeele, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Herman Segal. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HERMAN SEGAL filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14304298 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Proposed Summons) (Skeele, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
