Lan et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Feng Lan, Ya Qing Lin, Haolin Lan and Xinlin Lan |
| Donald Neufeld, Tracy Renaud and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2021cv01592 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Patrick Greene-Delgado on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Greene-Delgado, Sean) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xinlin Lan, Feng Lan, Haolin Lan, Ya Qing Lin. Tracy Renaud served on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xinlin Lan, Feng Lan, Haolin Lan, Ya Qing Lin. Donald Neufeld served on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xinlin Lan, Feng Lan, Haolin Lan, Ya Qing Lin. Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/25/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. (Lee, Corey) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically Ordered by Clerk of Court on 3/29/2021. (Marziliano, August)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Feng Lan, Haolin Lan, Xinlin Lan, Ya Qing Lin. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Donald Neufeld, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE :Plaintiff Counsel is advised to file a Motion for a refund of fees for the first payment made on this case. Please Use the Event Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. This event can be found under the event Civil Events - Motions and Related Filings - Motions- Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14313260 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Xinlin Lan, Feng Lan, Haolin Lan, Ya Qing Lin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lee, Corey) |
| NOTICE: Please file the Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summon for the following case so that it may be processed. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
