Chen v. Bowes et al
| Qiguang Chen |
| Acting Secretary DHS David Pekoske, District Director Lee F. Bowes, Texas Service Center and Acting AG Monty Wilkinson |
| 1:2021cv01708 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice, respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by Lee F. Bowes, David Pekoske, Texas Service Center, Monty Wilkinson (Freismuth, Megan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Jeanette Freismuth on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Freismuth, Megan) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The #6 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. No Clerk's Judgment shall be issued. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/21/2021. (Gonzalez, Fida)
|
|
ORDER: Per the Court's 6/29/2021 Order, Plaintiff was directed to file proof of service or a status report in this matter by 7/13/2021, yet has failed to do so. Plaintiff shall file proof of service or a status report by 7/21/2021, otherwise this case will be dismissed. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/14/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew)
|
|
ORDER: The #1 Complaint in this case was filed on 3/30/2021. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff was required to serve Defendants with the Summons and a copy of the Complaint by 6/28/2021. By 7/13/2021, Plaintiff shall file proof of service or a status report in this matter. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/29/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Lee F. Bowes, David Pekoske, Texas Service Center, Monty Wilkinson, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Lee F. Bowes, David Pekoske, Texas Service Center, Monty Wilkinson filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14322961 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Qiguang Chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (De Luca, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
