Colon v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
| Carmen Colon |
| Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Jane Doe, John Doe and PHH Mortgage Corporation |
| 1:2021cv01749 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Defendants filed letter-motions for a pre-motion conference on May 7, 2021. In direct contravention of this Court's Individual Practices, Plaintiff failed to submit a letter response either opposing Defendants' motions or advising the Court it does not intend to oppose the motions. On May 18, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a response. Plaintiff failed to do so. Plaintiff is again directed to file a response, not to exceed three (3) pages, on or before May 24, 2021, in accordance with this Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff's failure to do so may result in dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 5/20/2021. (Williams, Erica)
|
|
ORDER: Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC filed letter motions #12 #13 for a pre-motion conference on its anticipated motion to dismiss on May 7, 2021. In direct contravention of this Court's Individual Rules and Practices, Plaintiff has failed to file a letter in response, either opposing the motion or advising the Court that it does not intend to oppose the motion. On or before May 19, 2021, Plaintiff is directed to file a letter not to exceed three (3) pages either opposing Defendants' motion or advising the Court that it does not intend to oppose the motion. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 5/18/2021. (Williams, Erica)
|
| Filing 13 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Pagnotta, Brittany) |
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Notice of Removal, To Dismiss by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Sirianni, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, jointly by PHH Mortgage Corporation and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Sirianni, Ryan) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to May 7, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/2/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Initial Conference will be held in this case on July 1, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.)Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By June 25, 2021, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Defense counsel is directed to ensure that Plaintiff is aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/31/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 9 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (Pagnotta, Brittany) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PHH Mortgage Corporation identifying Corporate Parent PHH Corporation, Corporate Parent Ocwen Financial Corporation for PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Sirianni, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick G. Broderick on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Broderick, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by PHH Mortgage Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent to Removal (Sirianni, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Sirianni on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Sirianni, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Computershare Limited for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Pagnotta, Brittany) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, case number 720933/2020. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14328359) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pagnotta, Brittany) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet (MISSING SECOND PAGE FORM). All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
