Stein v. Energy Transfer LP et al
| Shiva Stein |
| Steven R. Anderson, Marshall S. McCrea, LE GP, LLC, Matthew S. Ramsey, Thomas E. Long, Ray C. Davis, Michael K. Grimm, Richard D. Brannon, Kelcy L. Warren, Elk GP Merger Sub LLC, James R. Perry, Ray W. Washburne, Elk Merger Sub LLC, Energy Transfer LP and John W. McReynolds |
| 1:2021cv01762 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This case was filed on March 31, 2021, ninety days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) by not filing proposed summons for issuance by the Clerk of the Court. The Plaintiff has failed to respond by July 15, 2021 to the Court's electronic order to show cause issued on July 8, 2021. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute without prejudice to re-open with a showing of good cause why Plaintiff has failed to file proposed summons and respond by July 15, 2021 to the Court's electronic order to show cause. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/28/2021. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This case was filed on March 31, 2021 and no proposed summons have been filed for issuance by the clerk as of this date. By July 15, 2021 plaintiff shall show cause by letter why they have not submitted proposed summons for issuance by the clerk and why this case should not be dismissed or failure to prosecute pursue to Rule 4 F.R.CV.P..Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/8/2021. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven R. Anderson, Richard D. Brannon, Ray C. Davis, Elk GP Merger Sub LLC, Elk Merger Sub LLC, Energy Transfer LP, Michael K. Grimm, LE GP, LLC, Thomas E. Long, Marshall S. McCrea, John W. McReynolds, James R. Perry, Matthew S. Ramsey, Kelcy L. Warren, Ray W. Washburne filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14330464 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Shiva Stein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Melwani, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
