Kryuchkov v. Vantruckmove, Inc. et al
| Sergey Kryuchkov |
| Pawel Lenkiewicz, Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz and Vantruckmove, Inc. doing business as Go to Moving and Storage |
| 1:2021cv01875 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| James R Cho |
| Eric R Komitee |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION by Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz, Pawel Lenkiewicz, Vantruckmove, Inc. (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION by Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz, Pawel Lenkiewicz, Vantruckmove, Inc. (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Mizrahi on behalf of Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz, Pawel Lenkiewicz, Vantruckmove, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Mizrahi, Jason) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Levin-Epstein on behalf of Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz, Pawel Lenkiewicz, Vantruckmove, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
ORDER re #18 : The parties' stipulation #18 is So Ordered. Defendants' time to reply or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through and including June 8, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/10/2021. (Hazelwood, John)
|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergey Kryuchkov. Mariola Lenkiewicz served on 4/17/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Luke, John) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergey Kryuchkov. Pawel Lenkiewicz served on 4/17/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Luke, John) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergey Kryuchkov. Josef Lenkiewicz served on 4/17/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Luke, John) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergey Kryuchkov. Vantruckmove, Inc. served on 4/17/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Luke, John) |
|
ORDER: The parties are directed to comply with the pretrial deadlines set by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on April 8, 2021, including the filing of a joint status report regarding settlement efforts by October 8, 2021. (Hazelwood, John)
|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Mahoney, Brenna) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Vantruckmove, Inc.. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Pawel summons, #2 Mariola summons, #3 Joseff summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER IN FLSA CASE REQUIRING DISCOVERY AND SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION SCHEDULE: The parties are ordered to engage in discovery as outlined in the attached Order, and to engage in early settlement discussions. A joint status report regarding settlement efforts must be filed by October 8, 2021. If the parties are unable to settle on their own, the case will be referred to EDNY Court-Annexed Mediation for formal mediation. The parties may move to waive these requirements and permit the parties to proceed by way of a Proposed Discovery Plan only for good cause, by filing a joint letter request on ECF. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/8/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. by Sergey Kryuchkov (Luke, John) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by Sergey Kryuchkov (Luke, John) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Sergey Kryuchkov (Luke, John) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Sergey Kryuchkov (Luke, John) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to file a proposed summons with the complaint and is ordered to do so immediately. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/8/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Sergey Kryuchkov (Luke, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Josef Lenkiewicz, Mariola Lenkiewicz, Pawel Lenkiewicz, Vantruckmove, Inc.d/b/a Go to Moving and Storage filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14351565 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Sergey Kryuchkov. (Luke, John) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
