Cong. Bais Mordechai Inc. v. Santander Bank, N.A. et al
| Cong. Bais Mordechai Inc. |
| Citibank, N.A. and Santander Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2021cv02180 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference scheduled on June 22, 2021 for 60 days or such other date convenient to the Court by Citibank, N.A.. (Park, Daniel) |
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The Telephone Initial Conference is adjourned to August 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.) By August 19, 2021, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 6/17/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for permission to make a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint filed by Cong. Bais Mordechai Inc.. (Singer, Moshe) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for permission to make a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Malloy, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for permission to make a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint by Citibank, N.A.. (Park, Daniel) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Citibank, N.A. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended nunc pro tunc to May 6, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/27/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint to and including May 6, 2021 on consent by Citibank, N.A.. (Park, Daniel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Michael D. Malloy is permitted to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant Santander Bank, N.A. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/21/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Initial Conference will be held in this case on June 22, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerks Office.)Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By June 17, 2021_, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Defense counsel is directed to ensure that Plaintiff is aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/21/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Santander Bank, N.A. re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Consent to Removal (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service of Notice of Consent to Removal) (Malloy, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Malloy on behalf of Santander Bank, N.A. (notification declined or already on case) (Malloy, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14397536. by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion, #2 Proposed Order for PHV Admission, #3 Certificate of Service of PHV Motion) (Malloy, Michael) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Citibank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Citigroup Inc. for Citibank, N.A.. (Park, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Citibank, N.A. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, case number 506547/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14392953) (Attachments: #1 Exh. A Pleadings and process, #2 Civil Cover sheet) (Park, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
