Rosenberg v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Plaintiff: Naftali Rosenberg
Defendant: McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02199
Filed: April 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Margo K Brodie
Referring Judge: Roanne L Mann
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Letter in response to Defendant's pre-motion letter by Naftali Rosenberg (Saland, Tamir)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT Naftali Rosenberg against McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc., filed by Naftali Rosenberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Saland, Tamir)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Document - Motion to Dismiss by McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Application granted, on consent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 5/24/2021. (LK)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. (Johnson, Matthew)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Brady Johnson on behalf of McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Johnson, Matthew)
May 20, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER [DE #7]: The Clerk is requested to remove this case from court-annexed arbitration. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 5/20/2021. (LK)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter re: Designation to Arbitration by Naftali Rosenberg (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Saland, Tamir)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration.This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7. The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7. An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. (Credle, Rita)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Naftali Rosenberg. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. served on 4/22/2021, answer due 5/13/2021. (Saland, Tamir)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14396463 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Naftali Rosenberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Saland, Tamir)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosenberg v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Brady Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naftali Rosenberg
Represented By: Tamir Saland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?