Perez v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
Regino Perez |
Does 1-10, inclusive and Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
1:2021cv02240 |
April 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Roanne L Mann |
Eric N Vitaliano |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER [DE #7]: The stipulation of discontinuance is due by July 19, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/21/2021. (LK) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Regino Perez (Tariq, Subhan) |
Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintif''s Complaint by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Briganti, Dana) |
ORDER Application granted, on consent. #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 5/26/2021. (LK) |
Filing 5 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Briganti, Dana) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Beth Silverman on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silverman, Ellen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Midland Credit Management, Inc. from Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, case number CV-007167-21. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14404025) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Verified Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Briganti, Dana) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
ORDER Application granted, on consent #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Replyto Plaintiff's Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 4/23/2021. (LK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.