Nelson et al v. Friedman et al
| Johanna Nelson, Maureen Nelson and Tamara Nelson |
| David Friedman, Joel Goldstein and Nate Weinberg |
| 1:2021cv02601 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Diane Gujarati |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal, See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 6/21/2021. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The court grants plaintiffs' #2 , #3 , #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for the limited purpose of this Order. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, plaintiffs' complaint fails to establish a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order and the judgment to plaintiffs and note service on the docket, enter judgment in favor of defendants, dismiss this action, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 6/17/2021. (Tran, Alexander)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto for all further proceedings. Judge Diane Gujarati no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/17/2021. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamara Nelson. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maureen Nelson. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johanna Nelson. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Maureen Nelson, Tamara Nelson, Johanna Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
