Kiler v. Splitwise Inc.
Plaintiff: Marion Kiler
Defendant: Splitwise Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02637
Filed: May 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Referring Judge: Cheryl L Pollak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 10/13/2021 @ 10:15 AM before Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 21-2637. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/7/2021. (Caggiano, Diana)
July 7, 2021 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - 9/6/2021. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/7/2021. (Caggiano, Diana)
July 6, 2021 Filing 5 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or otherwise plead in response thereto by Splitwise Inc.. (Braunstein, Andrew)
May 11, 2021 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 11, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 11, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Splitwise Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 11, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Splitwise Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14459967 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Marion Kiler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Shaked, Dan)
May 11, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kiler v. Splitwise Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marion Kiler
Represented By: Dan Shaked
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Splitwise Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Max Braunstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?