Olsen v. Curious Elixers LLC
Thomas J Olsen |
Curious Elixers LLC |
1:2021cv02772 |
May 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Peggy Kuo |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 Letter Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Curious Elixers LLC (Travis, Maximilian) Modified on 6/22/2021 to reflect this is a motion for extension of time to file answer (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas J Olsen. Curious Elixers LLC served on 6/1/2021, answer due 6/22/2021. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Curious Elixers LLC. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Thomas J Olsen (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Thomas J Olsen (Lipsky, Douglas) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/18/2021) (Lee, Tiffeny). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Curious Elixers LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14478702 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Thomas J Olsen. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Olsen v. Curious Elixers LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Curious Elixers LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas J Olsen | |
Represented By: | Douglas Brian Lipsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.