Carr v. Hallett et al
| Dorian Carr |
| Capt. Powell, Capt. Thompson, Capt. Libaud and Warden Michelle Hallett |
| 1:2021cv02808 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Dorian Carr. Captain Libaud served on 6/10/2021 (answer due 7/28/2021). (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Dorian Carr. Captain Thompson served on 6/10/2021 (answer due 7/28/2021). (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Dorian Carr. Captain Powell served on 6/10/2021 (answer due 7/28/2021). (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Dorian Carr. Warden Michelle Hallett served on 6/10/2021 (answer due 7/28/2021). (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for All Defendants Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint by July 28, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 6/28/2021. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Michelle Hallett, Libaud, Powell, Thompson. (Toews, Mark) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Warden Michelle Hallett; Captain Powell; Captain Thompson and Captain Libaud. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 5/20/2021 Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the Office of the Corporation Counsel via first class mail.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The United States Marshals Service is hereby directed to serve the summons and the complaintupon the defendants without prepayment of fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 5/20/2021. (Herrera, Isaiah)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Pay Civil Filing Fee - Prisoner Case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff/petitioner is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiffs/petitioners prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). Original letter sent to the Warden/Superintendent of Correctional Facility. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dorian Carr. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michelle Hallett, Libaud, Powell, Thompson, filed by Dorian Carr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
