Treyger v. Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC et al
| Leonid Treyger |
| Corporations 1-X, John Doe 1-X, Remica Property Group Corp. and Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC |
| 1:2021cv02906 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC, Remica Property Group Corp. has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC, Remica Property Group Corp. is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Poveda, J.) |
ORDER: The Court so-orders the deadline proposed by Plaintiff of August 10, 2021 to file their motion for default judgment. Plaintiff is directed to Local Civil Rules 7.1 and 55.2. Plaintiff is reminded that it remains Plaintiff's burden to demonstrate the well-pleaded allegations in the Complaint and establish Defendants' liability on each asserted cause of action. Plaintiff also bears the burden of presenting proof of damages, which may take the form of documentary evidence and detailed affidavits. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/19/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by Leonid Treyger (Grinblat, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Request for Certificate of Default by Leonid Treyger (Grinblat, Michael) |
|
ORDER: The time to answer has passed. By July 20, 2021, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report indicating how they intend to proceed, including whether they will seek a certificate of default. See Local Civ. R. 55.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/13/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leonid Treyger. Remica Property Group Corp. served on 6/4/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. (Grinblat, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leonid Treyger. Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC served on 6/4/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. (Grinblat, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Initial Conference will be held in this case on August 24, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.)Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By August 19, 2021, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendants are aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 5/25/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC, Remica Property Group Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Remica summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14499704 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Leonid Treyger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Nulife of Brooklyn, LLC, #3 Proposed Summons Remica Property Group Corp.) (Grinblat, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
