Hurvitz v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al
Aaron Hurvitz |
Macys, Inc., Richard Schwartz, Hoan Ton-That, Clearview AI, Inc., Thomas Mulcaire and Rocky Mountain Data Analytics LLC |
1:2021cv02960 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Peggy Kuo |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE: 1:21-cv-02960 DETAILS: Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3 as case 1:21-cv-03373, filed 06/23/2021. (Marziliano, August) |
Filing 23 CERTIFIED COPY of JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order CTO-2: Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of December 15, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. (Marziliano, August) |
Case transferred to District of Northern District of Illinois. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Marziliano, August) |
Filing 22 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order CTO-2: Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of December 15, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (Marziliano, August) |
Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Macys, Inc. served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Hoan Ton-That served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Richard Schwartz served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Rocky Mountain Data Analytics LLC served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Thomas Mulcaire served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Hurvitz. Clearview AI, Inc. served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Hoan Ton-That. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Richard Schwartz. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Rocky Mountain Data Analytics LLC. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Thomas Mulcaire. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Macys, Inc.. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Clearview AI, Inc.. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Drury on behalf of Aaron Hurvitz (notification declined or already on case) (Drury, Scott) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14530978. by Aaron Hurvitz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Scott Drury, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Drury, Scott) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Aaron Hurvitz (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Macy's Inc., #2 Proposed Summons Thomas Mulcaire, #3 Proposed Summons Rocky Mountain Data Analytics, #4 Proposed Summons Richard Schwartz, #5 Proposed Summons Hoan Ton-That) (Newirth, Karen) |
![]() |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Aaron Hurvitz (Newirth, Karen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clearview AI, Inc., Macys, Inc., Thomas Mulcaire, Rocky Mountain Data Analytics LLC, Richard Schwartz, Hoan Ton-That filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14508733 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Aaron Hurvitz. (Newirth, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.