Kelly v. The City of New York et al
Hollis Kelly |
John Does #1-6, The City of New York and Officer John M Brodie |
1:2021cv03210 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Roanne L Mann |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer The City of New York answer due 9/20/2021. Application granted, on consent. In addition, plaintiff is directed to promptly execute and forward the referenced authorization to defense counsel for processing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 7/22/2021. (LK) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer ON CONSENT by The City of New York. (Beck, Curt) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hollis Kelly. John M Brodie served on 5/10/2021, answer due 5/31/2021. (Mindicino, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hollis Kelly. The City of New York served on 5/6/2021, answer due 5/27/2021. (Mindicino, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of removal and civil cover sheet served on Plaintiff and Officer Brodie on 6/7/21, filed by The City of New York. (Owen, Andrew) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by The City of New York (Owen, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The City of New York from Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, case number 509738/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14543009) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of service, #3 Exhibit Consent to remove) (Owen, Andrew) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.