Forrest v. Heartshare Human Services of New York
| Michelle Forrest |
| Heartshare Human Services of New York |
| 1:2021cv03500 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| William F Kuntz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court dispenses with its pre-motion conference requirement. Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference as moot, ECF No. #8 , and GRANTS leave to file the anticipated motion to dismiss. The Court hereby ORDERS the following briefing schedule for Defendant's motion: Defendant shall submit their motion by Friday, September 17, 2021 at 5:00 P.M.; Plaintiff shall submit their response by Friday, October 29, 2021 at 5:00 P.M.; and Defendant shall submit their reply, if any, by Friday, December 3, 2021 at 5:00 P.M. SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 8/5/2021. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to file a motion to dismiss by Heartshare Human Services of New York. (Toren, Stefanie) |
|
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 is granted. Defendant Heartshare Human Services of New York shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 by 8/4/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/25/2021. (Farrell, Gillian)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Respond by Heartshare Human Services of New York. (Toren, Stefanie) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic-initial conference will be held at 12:00 P.M. on 9/2/2021 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) report worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 9/2/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) report worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/20/2021. (Manson, Eddie)
|
|
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #5 is granted. Defendant Heartshare Human Services of New York shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 by 7/28/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/9/2021. (Farrell, Gillian)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Heartshare Human Services of New York. (Toren, Stefanie) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Heartshare Human Services of New York. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Heartshare Human Services of New York filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14587466 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Michelle Forrest. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Abrams, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Forrest v. Heartshare Human Services of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Heartshare Human Services of New York | |
| Represented By: | Stefanie Robin Toren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Forrest | |
| Represented By: | David Abrams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
