Webb v. Joblove et al
| Christopher Webb |
| Leonard Joblove, Eric Gonzalez and Howard Goodman |
| 1:2021cv03686 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); 1915A, in its entirety; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal, Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 8/19/2021. (Copy of Judgment and Appeals Packet mailed to Pro Se). (Herrera, Isaiah) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the foregoing reasons, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis, is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); 1915A, in its entirety as set forth above. Although pro se plaintiffs are ordinarily accord leave to amend the complaint at least once, in cases like this, where it is clear that any attempt to amend would be futile, leave to amend need not be given, and for that reason it is denied here. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to plaintiff, and to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 7/26/2021. (Herrera, Isaiah)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Pay Civil Filing Fee - Prisoner Case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff/petitioner is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiffs/petitioners prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). Original letter sent to the Warden/Superintendent of Correctional Facility. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Webb. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eric Gonzalez, Howard Goodman, Leonard Joblove, filed by Christopher Webb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
