Sandy v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Natasha Sandy |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv03807 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Service on Pro Se Plaintiff by Commissioner of Social Security (McKimens, Pam) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Pam McKimens on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (McKimens, Pam) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank D. Tankard on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Tankard, Frank) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 7/13/2021 Order and Plaintiff's #1 Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Defendant shall obtain and serve upon the plaintiff the administrative record of the proceedings, which shall constitute defendant's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint within ninety (90) days of commencement of this action. Defendant shall move for judgment on the pleadings, unless otherwise directed by the court, by service of motion papers upon plaintiff within sixty (60) days of service of the administrative record upon the plaintiff. Plaintiff's response papers shall be served upon defendant within sixty (60) days thereafter. Within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of plaintiff's response (that is, by February 14, 2022), defendant shall serve its reply on plaintiff, and the parties shall file the entire set of motion papers, the stipulation of facts, and the administrative record with the court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at plaintiff's address of record and to note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 7/13/2021. (Rodriguez Armenta, Elena)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Natasha Sandy. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Natasha Sandy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sandy v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Natasha Sandy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Frank D. Tankard |
| Represented By: | Pam McKimens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
