Dore v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sonia Lopez Dore |
| Acting Commissioner Social Security |
| 1:2021cv03928 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: By January 14, 2022 counsel shall file the complete administrative record and their fully briefed motions for judgment on the pleadings. Counsel shall follow J. Block's motion rules, specifically section 2(D) when filing their motions. Counsel are not required to serve a courtesy copy of the motion papers or administrative record with the court. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 9/10/2021. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 6 Service of Transcript Administrative (Social Security Appeal) on Plaintiff's Counsel on September 10, 2021 (McKimens, Pam) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sonia Lopez Dore. Acting Commissioner Social Security served on 8/12/2021, answer due 10/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt) (Binder, Charles) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Pam McKimens on behalf of Acting Commissioner Social Security (aty to be noticed) (McKimens, Pam) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Acting Commissioner Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 US Attorney summons, #2 Attorney General summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acting Commissioner Social Security filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14649531 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Sonia Lopez Dore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C, #8 Exhibit D, #9 Exhibit E, #10 Exhibit F) (Binder, Charles) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dore v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sonia Lopez Dore | |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Binder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Acting Commissioner Social Security | |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Pam McKimens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
