Ali v. United States of America et al
| KAZI HAIDAR ALI |
| United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Secret Service |
| 1:2021cv03950 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #9 motion for a pre-motion conference. The pre-mtoion conference will take place on February 28, 2022 at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 4G North. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/20/2022. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Kazi Haidar Ali. (Dayan, Albert) |
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Letter as per Judge's Order of December 6, 2021 by Kazi Haidar Ali. (Dayan, Albert) |
|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The plaintiff must respond to the defendant's letter motion for a pre-motion conference by February 7, 2022. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/4/2022. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Letter as per Judge's Order of December 3, 2021, by Kazi Haidar Ali. (Dayan, Albert) |
|
ORDER granting #11 the plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File. By January 6, 2022, the plaintiff is directed to re-file a letter, not to exceed 3 pages, that sets forth the bases for the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/6/2021. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
|
ORDER: The court has received #10 the plaintiff's response to the defendant's letter motion for a pre-motion conference. Pursuant to my Individual Rules and Practices 4.A, by December 10, 2021, the plaintiff is directed to re-file a letter, not to exceed 3 pages, that sets forth the bases for the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/3/2021. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Kazi Haidar Ali. (Dayan, Albert) |
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint by United States of America. (Lekakis, Artemis) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The plaintiff is directed to respond to the defendants' pre-motion conference request letter by December 6, 2021. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 11/29/2021. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, United States of America. (Lekakis, Artemis) |
|
ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. The government must file its response to the complaint by November 29, 2021. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 10/7/2021. (Lawoyin, Feyilana)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kazi Haidar Ali. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service to the United States Department of Homeland Security., #2 Certificate of Service to the United States Secret Service.) (Dayan, Albert) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Kazi Haidar Ali (Dayan, Albert) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 7/14/2021 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 7/14/2021 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. Incorrect form of Summons. Please resubmit correct form. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by KAZI HAIDAR ALI (Dayan, Albert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14652251 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by KAZI HAIDAR ALI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 Exhibit INVOICE OF THE JEWELRY, #3 Exhibit LETTER FROM U.S.S.S., #4 Exhibit PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR REMISSION/MITIGATION, #5 Exhibit PLAINTIFF'S SWORN AFFIDAVIT) (Dayan, Albert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
