Schwimmer v. Rubin & Rothman LLC
Plaintiff: Leiser Schwimmer
Defendant: Rubin & Rothman LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv04175
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Margo K Brodie
Referring Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Leiser Schwimmer (Saland, Tamir)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER finding as moot #9 Motion to Dismiss. The Court denies Plaintiff's #9 motion to dismiss as moot in view of the #11 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/1/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph)
September 1, 2021 Civil Case Terminated. (Valentin, Winnethka)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic-initial conference will be held at 2:00 P.M. on 10/1/2021 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached FDCPA worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 10/1/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the FDCPA worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/26/2021. (Manson, Eddie)
August 25, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Leiser Schwimmer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Saland, Tamir)
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Defendant seeks to answer the Complaint #1 . Defendant's answer was due on 8/19/2021. Because it is seeking to answer after the time to do so has passed, Defendant must file a motion by 9/15/2021 that explains why, under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), a belated answer is permissible, and why a default should not be entered. Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/25/2021. (Bruckner, Ian)
August 24, 2021 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rubin & Rothman LLC. (Arleo, Robert)
August 24, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rubin & Rothman LLC (Arleo, Robert)
August 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Arleo on behalf of Rubin & Rothman LLC (aty to be noticed) (Arleo, Robert)
August 11, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leiser Schwimmer. Rubin & Rothman LLC served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. (Saland, Tamir)
July 26, 2021 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 26, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 26, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rubin & Rothman LLC. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Leiser Schwimmer against Rubin & Rothman LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14691390 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Leiser Schwimmer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Saland, Tamir)
July 26, 2021 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwimmer v. Rubin & Rothman LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leiser Schwimmer
Represented By: Tamir Saland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rubin & Rothman LLC
Represented By: Robert L. Arleo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?