Schwimmer v. Rubin & Rothman LLC
Leiser Schwimmer |
Rubin & Rothman LLC |
1:2021cv04175 |
July 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Leiser Schwimmer (Saland, Tamir) |
ORDER finding as moot #9 Motion to Dismiss. The Court denies Plaintiff's #9 motion to dismiss as moot in view of the #11 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/1/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph) |
Civil Case Terminated. (Valentin, Winnethka) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic-initial conference will be held at 2:00 P.M. on 10/1/2021 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached FDCPA worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 10/1/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the FDCPA worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/26/2021. (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Leiser Schwimmer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Saland, Tamir) |
ORDER: Defendant seeks to answer the Complaint #1 . Defendant's answer was due on 8/19/2021. Because it is seeking to answer after the time to do so has passed, Defendant must file a motion by 9/15/2021 that explains why, under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), a belated answer is permissible, and why a default should not be entered. Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/25/2021. (Bruckner, Ian) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rubin & Rothman LLC. (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rubin & Rothman LLC (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Arleo on behalf of Rubin & Rothman LLC (aty to be noticed) (Arleo, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leiser Schwimmer. Rubin & Rothman LLC served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. (Saland, Tamir) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rubin & Rothman LLC. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Leiser Schwimmer against Rubin & Rothman LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14691390 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Leiser Schwimmer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Saland, Tamir) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schwimmer v. Rubin & Rothman LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leiser Schwimmer | |
Represented By: | Tamir Saland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rubin & Rothman LLC | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Arleo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.