Fischler v. Jot Labs LLC
Brian Fischler |
Jot Labs LLC |
1:2021cv04273 |
July 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
James R Cho |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Brian Fischler. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Fischler. Jot Labs LLC served on 8/16/2021, answer due 9/6/2021. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Jot Labs LLC shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 10/6/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 9/1/2021. (Gillespie, Saudia) |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jot Labs LLC. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jot Labs LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14706706 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Brian Fischler. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fischler v. Jot Labs LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brian Fischler | |
Represented By: | Douglas Brian Lipsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jot Labs LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.