Goodman v. Local 804 Union of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) et al
| Leonard F. Goodman |
| Local 804 Union of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) and United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) |
| 1:2021cv04655 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Local 804 Union of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS), filed by Leonard F. Goodman. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Honorable Ann M. Donnelly assigned this case to me for all pretrial purposes. Enclosed is a copy of the "Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom." Plaintiff and defendant, alike, are required to follow these rules. Plaintiff is to provide a copy of this Order and the enclosed rules to defendants along with the summons and complaint. Plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of this Order to serve defendants and file proof of service with the Court. Accordingly, if proper service is not made upon defendants by 12/8/2021, or if plaintiff fails to show good cause why such service has not been effected by that date, it will be recommended that the Court should dismiss this action without prejudice. Plaintiff may choose to receive electronic notification of court issued filings in this civil case. If plaintiff is eligible and wishes to receive electronic notification of court issued documents, plaintiff should complete the attached Registration and Consent form and return the form to the Court.1 Plaintiff is advised that even if he chooses to receive electronic notifications in this action, he is still required to advise the Court of any change to her mailing address. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 9/9/2021. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, #2 Instruction for Pro Se Registration and Consent for Electronic Service of Orders and Notices Issued by the Court in Civil Cases, #3 Pro Se Registration and Consent Form. (Service upon Defendants due by 12/8/2021.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing 4
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 3
FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 4653159294 (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Leonard F. Goodman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
