Wilks v. City of New York et al
| Omar Wilks |
| City of New York, Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro, Thomas J Richardson, Daniel Brown, Fred Shaaf, David Morkal, Carlos Velez, FDNY and JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-10 |
| 1:2021cv04738 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Daniel Brown, City of New York, FDNY, David Morkal, Daniel Nigro, Thomas J Richardson, Fred Shaaf, Carlos Velez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit) (Wilkens, Kimberly) |
ORDER: The Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint #9 is granted in part. Defendants City of New York and FDNY must answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint by 10/20/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/7/2021. (Morrow, Emily)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Omar Wilks. (Aboushi, Aymen) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Omar Wilks. Daniel Brown served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021; City of New York served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/13/2021; FDNY served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/13/2021; JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-10 served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021; David Morkal served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021; Daniel Nigro served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021; Thomas J Richardson served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021; Fred Shaaf served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021; Carlos Velez served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Return of Service FDNY, #2 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Richardson, #3 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Shaaf, #4 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Brown, #5 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Morkal, #6 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Nigro, #7 Affidavit of Service Return of Service Velez) (Aboushi, Aymen) |
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by City of New York, FDNY. (Wilkens, Kimberly) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 10:30 A.M. on 12/03/2021 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 12/03/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/21/2021. (Manson, Eddie)
|
|
ORDER: The First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint #6 is hereby granted in part. Defendants City of New York and FDNY must answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint by 10/13/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/14/2021. (Morrow, Emily)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint filed by All Plaintiffs. (Aboushi, Aymen) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by City of New York, FDNY. (Wilkens, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Wilkens on behalf of City of New York, FDNY (aty to be noticed) (Wilkens, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Daniel Brown, City of New York, FDNY, JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-10, David Morkal, Daniel Nigro, Thomas J Richardson, Fred Shaaf, Carlos Velez. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNYEDC-14775049 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Omar Wilks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Aboushi, Aymen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
