Klich et al v. Klimczak et al
Plaintiff: Mark Klich, Aluminum Fabricators Corp. and R. King Windows Corp.
Defendant: Konrad Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak and Marek Jaros
Case Number: 1:2021cv04812
Filed: August 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #17 Affidavit in Response to Plaintiffs Order to Show Cause by Marek Jaros, Konrad Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak (Brejt, Jenny)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #18 . Defendants' reply to plaintiff's response #17 shall be filed by 11/15/2021. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/9/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Document IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Marek Jaros, Konrad Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak. (Brejt, Jenny)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION IN RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Aluminum Fabricators Corp., Mark Klich, R. King Windows Corp. (Ilasz, Livius)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by James Emmet Murphy on behalf of Marek Jaros, Konrad Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak (aty to be noticed) (Murphy, James)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Minute Entry and Order to Show Cause for Initial Status Conference and Premotion Conference held before Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/21/2021. Counsel for both parties present by phone. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 11/4/2021 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. See Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil, 324 U.S. 697, 706-07 (1945); Garcia v. Jambox, 14-cv-3504, 2015 WL 2359502 at *14-15 (S.D.N.Y. April 27, 2015); Joo v. Kitchen Table, Inc., 763 F. Supp. 2d 643, 648 (S.D.N.Y. 2011); Dees v. Hydradry, 706 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 1243 (M.D. Fla. 2010) ("A confidentiality provision in an FLSA settlement agreement both contravenes the legislative purpose of the FLSA and undermines the Department of Labor's regulatory effort to notify employees of their FLSA rights."). See transcript for details. (Court Reporter: Victoria Butler.) (Weisberg, Peggy)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Marek Jaros, Konrad Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak. (Davis, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marek Jaros, Konrad Klimczak, Wojciech Klimczak, Zdzislaw Klimczak, filed by Mark Klich, R. King Windows Corp., Aluminum Fabricators Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Davis, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 9/2/2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Residence is not determinative of citizenship. See 147-149 McCarren, LLC v. Holding De Gestion Turistica MIJ Spain S.L., No. 21-CV-950, 2021 WL 878557, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2021). Plaintiffs need to disclose whether Klich is a citizen of New York and not a dual citizen of any foreign country. They also need to allege the citizenship of each of the defendants, not just their residence. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/26/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number ANYEDC-14785984 (Davis, Kimberly)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klich et al v. Klimczak et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Klich
Represented By: Livius Ilasz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aluminum Fabricators Corp.
Represented By: Livius Ilasz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. King Windows Corp.
Represented By: Livius Ilasz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Konrad Klimczak
Represented By: Jenny S. Brejt
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: James Emmet Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zdzislaw Klimczak
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: James Emmet Murphy
Represented By: Jenny S. Brejt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wojciech Klimczak
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: James Emmet Murphy
Represented By: Jenny S. Brejt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marek Jaros
Represented By: James Emmet Murphy
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: Jenny S. Brejt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?