Sims v. Birch Family Services, Inc. et al
| Brandi Sims |
| Birch Family Services, Inc. and Matthew Sturiale |
| 1:2021cv04981 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brandi Sims. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 12/17/2021 @ 10:15 AM before Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 21-4981. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/6/2021. (Caggiano, Diana)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Birch Family Services, Inc., Matthew Sturiale. (Krebs, Diane) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacqueline Wild on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Wild, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Diane Krebs on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Krebs, Diane) |
| ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - answer due 11/12/2021. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/6/2021. (Caggiano, Diana) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brandi Sims. Matthew Sturiale served on 9/20/2021, answer due 10/11/2021. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brandi Sims. Birch Family Services, Inc. served on 9/20/2021, answer due 10/11/2021. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Birch Family Services, Inc., Matthew Sturiale. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brandi Sims (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Birch Family Services, Inc., Matthew Sturiale filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14809983 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Brandi Sims. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
