Hossain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Tahmina Hossain
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Antony Blinken and Earl R. Miller
Case Number: 1:2021cv05098
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Eric R Komitee
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Petition for Naturalization Hearing Acknowledgement filed by Tahmina Hossain. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Service Receipts) (Samuel, Michael)
September 30, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Daniel Volpe on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Volpe, Christopher)
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Earl R. Miller, U.S. Embassy, Dhaka, Bangladesh, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of State, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly)
September 14, 2021 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 14, 2021 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 14, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 13, 2021 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Petition for Naturalization Hearing by Tahmina Hossain (Samuel, Michael)
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Petition for Naturalization Hearing by Tahmina Hossain (Attachments: #1 Rider Listing Defendants) (Samuel, Michael)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Naturalization Hearing filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14833432, filed by Tahmina Hossain. (Samuel, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hossain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tahmina Hossain
Represented By: Michael Samuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of State
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Embassy, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earl R. Miller
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Volpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?