Remler v. Cona Elder Law, PLLC et al
Jane Remler |
Cona Elder Law, PLLC, Genser, Dubow, Genser & Cona, LLP and 150 Riverside Op. LLC doing business as The Riverside Premier Rehabilitation and Healing Center |
1:2021cv05176 |
September 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Lois Bloom |
Allyne R Ross |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to 150 Riverside Op. LLC. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons. by Jane Remler (Keshavarz, Ahmad) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Cona Elder Law, PLLC. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 6 by Jane Remler (Keshavarz, Ahmad) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Jane Remler (Keshavarz, Ahmad) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jane Remler (Keshavarz, Ahmad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 150 Riverside Op. LLC d/b/a The Riverside Premier Rehabilitation and Healing Center, Cona Elder Law, PLLC f/k/a Genser, Dubow, Genser & Cona, LLP filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14848294 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Jane Remler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Insurance Letter Denying Further Coverage, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Discharge, #3 Exhibit C - May 6, 2020 Statement, #4 Exhibit D - May 15, 2020 Statement, #5 Exhibit E - Overbilling Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Collection Letter, #7 Exhibit G - Summons with Notice, #8 Exhibit H - Insurance Letter Stating No Claim, #9 Exhibit I - Demand for Complaint, #10 Exhibit J - December 29, 2020 Statement, #11 Exhibit K - February 11, 2021 Statement, #12 Exhibit L - February 23, 2021 Statement, #13 Exhibit M - Verified Complaint, #14 Exhibit N - Motion to Dismiss, #15 Exhibit O - Opposition to MTD, #16 Exhibit P - Reply, #17 Exhibit Q - March 2, 2021 Statement, #18 Exhibit R - April 29 Insurance Letter Requesting Information, #19 Exhibit S - May 24 Insurance Letter Requesting Information, #20 Exhibit T - July 15, 2021 Statement, #21 Exhibit U - August 13, 2021 Statement, #22 Exhibit V - Stipulation of Discontinuance, #23 Exhibit W - Franklin Complaint, #24 Exhibit X - Order Dismissing Action) (Keshavarz, Ahmad) |
Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.