Heil et al v. Dart Industries Inc. et al
Sherry Heil and Jack Heil |
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Dart Industries Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, SmithKline Beecham Corp., Rowell Laboratories, Inc., E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. and The Upjohn Company |
1:2021cv05274 |
September 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Vera M Scanlon |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, a Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 2/16/22 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 2/8/22. The parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Please do not use the speaker function on your phone, remember to identify yourselves every time you speak, and speak slowly and deliberately for purposes of the record. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Plaintiffs are directed to serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/17/2021. (Lozar, Ryan) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Dart Industries Inc., E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Rowell Laboratories, Inc., The Upjohn Company. (Piper, Francine) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #4 Amended Complaint by Jack Heil, Sherry Heil (London, Michael) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sherry Heil, Jack Heil. (London, Michael) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dart Industries Inc., E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Rowell Laboratories, Inc., The Upjohn Company. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Sherry Heil, Jack Heil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 4653160052 (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.