Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cattlin et al
Plaintiff: Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant: Daniel Cattlin and William R. Shupe
Case Number: 1:2021cv05294
Filed: September 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James R Cho
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2021 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Daniel Cattlin. (Guzzi, Roseann)
September 30, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Burdette Shields on behalf of Securities & Exchange Commission (notification declined or already on case) (Shields, Kathleen)
September 30, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Forni on behalf of Securities & Exchange Commission (notification declined or already on case) (Forni, Eric)
September 29, 2021 Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by Securities & Exchange Commission (Klunder, Nita)
September 29, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities & Exchange Commission. William R. Shupe waiver sent on 9/27/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. (Klunder, Nita)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #4 and #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys Eric Forni and Kathleen Burdette Shields shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. In accordance with Local Rule 1.3 (c) attorneys appearing for federal agencies may submit certificates of good standing issued within one year. Therefore, the previously submitted certificates are accepted. Counsel is directed to disregard the notice previously entered on 9/27/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 9/29/2021. (Gillespie, Saudia)
September 27, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate) (Marziliano, August)
September 27, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate) (Marziliano, August)
September 27, 2021 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.3, the petition to be admitted pro hac vice shall be accompanied by a certificate of the clerk of the court for each of the states in which the applicant is a member of the bar, which has been issued within thirty (30) days of filing and states that the applicant is a member in good standing of the bar of that state court. Counsel Eric Forni and Kathleen Burdette Shields are directed to file updated certificate(s) of good standing using the ECF event "Letter" and link the documents to their motion. (Gillespie, Saudia)
September 23, 2021 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 23, 2021 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Klunder, Nita)
September 23, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cattlin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities & Exchange Commission
Represented By: Nita Klunder
Represented By: Eric Forni
Represented By: Kathleen Burdette Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Cattlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William R. Shupe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?