Zhang v. Houghton et al
| Tiejun Zhang |
| NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center (NSC) and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2021cv05495 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Civil Case Terminated aas per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/12/2021. (Cogan, Brian)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center (NSC) (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Jia on behalf of Tiejun Zhang (aty to be noticed) (Jia, Jason) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tiejun Zhang. Merrick Garland served on 10/6/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Timothy Houghton served on 10/6/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/6/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Nebraska Service Center (NSC) served on 10/6/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. (De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ekta R. Dharia on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center (NSC), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 11/17/2021 at 9:15 am. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 5495#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/5/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center (NSC) filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14900011 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Tiejun Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (De Luca, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
