Zheng v. Houghton et al
| Yan Bin Zheng |
| NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2021cv05567 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Jia on behalf of Yan Bin Zheng (aty to be noticed) (Jia, Jason) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint, filed by Yan Bin Zheng. The United States of Attorney, as attorney for defendants is directed to show cause on or before 12/15/21, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 1/12/22, plaintiff shall file a reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. Oral argument shall be heard on 4/7/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6F North before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/20/2021. All copies mailed electronically via CM/ECF (Piper, Francine)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shana C. Priore on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Priore, Shana) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yan Bin Zheng. Merrick Garland served on 10/7/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Timothy Houghton served on 10/7/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/7/2021, answer due 12/6/2021; Texas Service Center served on 10/7/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. (De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14910631 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Yan Bin Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (De Luca, Stephen) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Neptune, Pierre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
