LIU v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Bing Min LIU
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Brian Meier, Ur Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas
Case Number: 1:2021cv05698
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice, Executed by the Parties by Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Brian Meier (Speight, Melanie)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Civil Case Terminated. as per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/22/2021. (Cogan, Brian)
November 1, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bing Min LIU. Merrick Garland served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021; Ur Jaddou served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021; Brian Meier served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021. (Idowu, Adedayo)
October 25, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie Mary Speight on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Speight, Melanie)
October 13, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly)
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 11/23/2021 at 9:30 am. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 5698#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/13/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
October 13, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Brian Meier filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14926216 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Bing Min LIU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Proposed Summons) (Idowu, Adedayo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LIU v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bing Min LIU
Represented By: Adedayo Olumide Idowu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick Garland
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director Brian Meier
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Jaddou
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?