Wen v. DeNayer et al
Plaintiff: Zhengying Wen
Defendant: Larry C. DeNayer, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan and Tracy Renaud
Case Number: 1:2021cv05804
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice, Executed by the Parties by Larry C. DeNayer, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Tracy Renaud (Speight, Melanie)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Civil Case Terminated as per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/24/2021. (Cogan, Brian)
November 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie Mary Speight on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Speight, Melanie)
October 28, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zhengying Wen. Larry C. DeNayer served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021; Merrick Garland served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021; Connie Nolan served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021; Tracy Renaud served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021. (Chang, John)
October 18, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Larry C. DeNayer, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry C. DeNayer, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Tracy Renaud filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14942108 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Zhengying Wen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Chang, John)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 11/30/2021 at 12:30 pm. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 5804#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/18/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
October 18, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wen v. DeNayer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zhengying Wen
Represented By: John Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry C. DeNayer
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connie Nolan
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Renaud
Represented By: Melanie Mary Speight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?